Agile at Work: Getting Better with Agile Retrospectives.
(Online Course)
Author
Contributors
Published
Carpenteria, CA linkedin.com, 2016.
Format
Online Course
Status
Description
Loading Description...
Also in this Series
Checking series information...
More Details
Language
English
Notes
General Note
2/04/201612:00:00AM
Participants/Performers
Presenter: Doug Rose
Description
In this final course in the Agile at Work series, explore the singular value of conducting an agile retrospective at the conclusion of every sprint.
Description
Designed to help increase the pace and quality of a team’s work, agile retrospectives utilize a structured format to gather insights, identify challenges, create a more agile mindset, and make a team more productive and successful. Author Doug Rose outlines the five phases of a successful retrospective: setting the right direction, getting all the issues on the table, gathering insights from the team, making decisions, and applying changes. He describes how to use a starfish diagram or PANCAKE approach to facilitate a comfortable and effective retrospective, and finally, discusses the importance of closing a retrospective with clear action items for the next sprint.
System Details
Latest version of the following browsers: Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or Internet Explorer. Adobe Flash Player Plugin. JavaScript and cookies must be enabled. A broadband Internet connection.
Citations
APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)
Rose, D. (2016). Agile at Work: Getting Better with Agile Retrospectives . linkedin.com.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Rose, Doug. 2016. Agile At Work: Getting Better With Agile Retrospectives. linkedin.com.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Rose, Doug. Agile At Work: Getting Better With Agile Retrospectives linkedin.com, 2016.
MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)Rose, Doug. Agile At Work: Getting Better With Agile Retrospectives linkedin.com, 2016.
Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.